Regarding Homosexuality And My “Friends”

By | December 19, 2013

I have never watched “Duck Dynasty” and didn’t exactly lose a lot of sleep over the show’s patriarch Phil Robertson, going on a homophobic rant. As someone else said somewhere, what do you expect when you put on a reality show about dyed-in-the-wool rednecks? Granted, not all rednecks are homophobes, but the Duck Dynasty people weren’t exactly selected for the show on the basis of socially enlightened attitudes.

The guy has the right to be a homophobe and bigot. And if A&E wants to drop him from the show, that’s their right. Those of you who say “But what about his freedom of speech!!!” are sort of missing the point — he’s entitled to say whatever he wants and the government can’t restrict that under the First Amendment, but a private entity like A&E is not required to give him a platform.

Unfortunately, as a result of the whole kerfluffle, some people on my Facebook and Twitter friends list have taken to championing Robertson’s cause and saying things like “I Stand With Phil Robertson.”

If you “stand with Phil Robertson” because you think A&E shouldn’t have suspended him from the show, that’s your right. No one is making you watch “Duck Dynasty.”

But on the other hand, if you “stand with Phil Robertson” because you agree with his absurdly Paleolithic points of view, then please, just let me know so I can defriend you. I’ve got lots of people from all over the political spectrum on my friends list and I generally avoid discussing political issues because so many people these days have their anger on a hair trigger. But there are a few topics I won’t compromise on — if you feel a need to rant about how disgusting gays are, or go on some sort of racist tangent ending with “but some of my best friends are black”, or things in that vein, then fineyou’ve got the right to speak your mind, but I have the right to quietly remove you from my friends list.

I support equal access to marriage for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered individuals. I support equal rights. I live in a state that has had civil unions and then same-sex marriage since July of 2000, and frankly, the knowledge that those people are getting married and moving in together all around me hasn’t damaged my own marriage. We have lots of same-sex couples, married and unmarried, around us, and it doesn’t affect me in the slightest what they do in the bedroom. And if it bothers you, again, fine — but feel free to share your fear and loathing somewhere else. Don’t waste my time.

I’m a churchgoing Christian, in case you were wondering. I’m a member of Faith United Methodist Church in South Burlington, Vermont. I wish I could say that everyone within the United Methodist Church feels the same way I do. Generally, most of my immediate church family does, but unfortunately, there are a lot of congregations in the South who don’t, and consequently, we’ve still got a lot of homophobic policies in the Methodist “Book of Discipline.” Every four years at the quadrennial World Conference, progressive churches try to change that, and every four years, the Southerners manage to block it.

Right now we’ve got an ongoing issue where the Reverend Frank Schaefer, who presided over a wedding between his son and another man in 2007, is facing suspension for refusing to recant and toe the line. I’m solidly on the line of Reverend Schaefer’s actions and it’s time I stood up and said so. His actions may go against our Book of Discipline. May, nothing. They do. And it’s time that the Book of Discipline was changed. This isn’t some minor petty issue like disagreeing over whether to use wine or grape juice during Communion. This strikes at the heart of what it means to be Methodist, and the claim that we espouse “Open Hearts. Open Minds. Open Doors.”

In the end, I know that time is on our side — each generation is more accepting of full civil rights for everyone than the one before it. Politicians like Rick Santorum, who are so homophobic that one can easily visualize them lying awake at night clutching the sheets, terrified that THE GAYS are creeping around outside in the bushes, are going to find it less and less effective to cater to the homophobes. But unfortunately, along the way, a lot of good, decent people are going to be hurt. That’s a shame, and it doesn’t help for those of us who do realize that equal rights doesn’t hurt anyone to simply stand by quietly.

So, stand with the bigots and the homophobes all you want. But don’t waste my time asking me to be your “friend”. I have enough friends without associating with those who apparently take pleasure from bigotry.

Leave a comment!

11 thoughts on “Regarding Homosexuality And My “Friends”

  1. Anita

    I am rarely at a loss for words, but I am having difficulty finding the right words at this moment. Amen and thank you will have to suffice for now. I may not know you outside of the 3-Day community, but if I’m ever in your (beautiful) neck of the woods, I would love to sit down with you and enjoy a cup of coffee and some conversation. Merry Christmas to you and yours!

  2. Michael Joseph Colombo

    It bothers me that anyone questioning homosexuality is dubbed homophobic. That reaction is as narrowminded as you claim those are who find it unacceptable. I merely find that homosexuality is inconsistent with biblical precepts. There are those who will say that is not true, but that is just silly. If you do you espouse “Open Hearts. Open Minds. Open Doors” then YOU too have to open your heart to those you fundamentally disagree with. We have decided that tolerance and acceptance are the same thing. they are not.

    1. Jay Furr Post author

      I cannot, in good conscience, stand by silently while my friends and acquaintances are hurt by narrow-minded people who selectively pick and choose from the Bible. While all are welcome within the Church, I do not have to open my Facebook feed, my Twitter feed, and my house to people who find homosexuality so tremendously repugnant. That’s my right and privilege.

      Feel and think as you do. But understand that your right to *have* an opinion, and *speak* an opinion does not oblige others to *listen* to your opinion.

      1. Kyle

        Your last sentence is the biggest problem in the entire debate: “But understand that your right to *have* an opinion, and *speak* an opinion does not oblige others to *listen* to your opinion.”
        Well said, and well put. It works both ways.
        Anyone ‘against’ homosexuality is wrong. However, get a damn backbone and accept that their opinions are different from yours.

        1. Jay Furr Post author

          I do listen to their opinions. At length. And what I hear, over and over, is that my homosexual friends are doomed to burn in hell. I’m not hearing a lot of nuance there. After a while, I say to myself, “I think I’ve had about enough.”

          I think a lot of this debate, as I said in my post, will be moot within a few years.

          Consider this scenario: someone you know decides to waste your time on a prolonged explanation of how blacks are racially and genetically inferior. Do you “grow a backbone” and sit and listen to them at length, or do you walk away? In a few years’ time, it’s going to be just like that regarding equal access to marriage.

  3. RexCraigo

    I don’t understand how you could possibly belong to any kind of church that doesn’t support your right to exist and have sex with whomever you like.

Comments are closed.